EVIDENCE OF NANO THERMITE
EVIDENCE OF NANO THERMITE
After the dust settled, several residents from New York collected dust samples and gave them to independent scientists to study. After years of research, these scientists discovered that Nano Thermite was found in all of these WTC dust samples. In 2009, it was Peer reviewed in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal (Steven Jones, Niels Harrit et al.). To this day, NIST and other researchers have never debunked the scientific peer reviewed paper or tested the dust themselves. Nano Thermite is a military grade incendiary/explosive created in US military labs, not from caves in the Tora Bora region. For more information on Nano Thermite, research ‘Iron rich spheres’, ‘Red gray chips’. Jon Cole “The great thermate debate”. ‘Nano Tubes’.
What is Nano Thermite?
What is Nano Thermite?
Nano Thermite = Fe2 O3 + 2Al
NANO THERMITE RESEARCH
BYU Physics Prof. Steven Jones Shows Video Evidence of Thermite Use on 9/11
The Un-Debunkable Molten Metal
Debunking Thermite: Not Molten Aluminum
Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust
How to Debunk Nano Thermite
Did nano-thermite take down the WTC? — RT
A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o (10 mins)
“Molten metal pours out of the South Tower several minutes before the collapse. This indicates the whole structure was being weakened in advance. Then the regular explosives come into play.” – Niels Harrit
The 9/11 “Deep Mystery” and the Crazy Engineers
Thermite Finger Print – A Special Report by Visibility 9-11
PEER REVIEWED PAPER
Peer reviewed Journal: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe pp.7-31 (25)
Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen.
“We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.”
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
“Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction”
NIST NANO THERMITE
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
“23. Why didn’t the NIST investigation consider reports of molten steel in the wreckage from the WTC towers?
NIST investigators and experts from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEONY)—who inspected the WTC steel at the WTC site and the salvage yards—found no evidence that would support the melting of steel in a jet-fuel ignited fire in the towers prior to collapse. The condition of the steel in the wreckage of the WTC towers (i.e., whether it was in a molten state or not) was irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse since it does not provide any conclusive information on the condition of the steel when the WTC towers were standing.
Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing.”
NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)
9/11 Skepticism: NIST floor test
FEMA METALLURGICAL EXAMINATION
Limited Metallurgical Examination (FEMA 403 Appendix C)
“The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.” FEMA, C-13, Appendix C.6
“Why do the same five or so individuals turn up in investigations relating to terrorist attacks, when, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), there are 1.5 million engineers in the US? The authors of the official report on the Murrah Federal building – Gene Corley, Charles Thornton, Paul Mlaker, and Mete Sozen – were all among the initial team of the ASCE WTC investigation.”
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
THERMITE – It can CUT I-Beams and Girders (Short Version)
9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel
Mark Basile ignites a chip (nano-thermite) – 9/11
Linear Thermite Cutting Charges
Kevin Ryan: Experiments with nanothermite
Case Report: Lung Disease in World Trade Center Responders Exposed to Dust and Smoke: Carbon Nanotubes Found in the Lungs of World Trade Center Patients and Dust Samples
9/11 More Evidence for Nanothermite in First Responders’ Lungs – Niels Harrit
We Have Ignition! Carbon Nanotubes Ignite When Exposed to Flash http://news.rpi.edu/luwakkey/383?destination=node%2F39840#sthash.3G9NEfSC.dpuf
“This discovery, reported in the April 26 issue of the journal Science, could mean that SWCNs might be used in light sensors or to remotely trigger explosives and combustion reactions, although researchers say that more testing needs to be done to realize these possibilities.”
Patent US20130206290 – Carbon nanotube explosives
“Exothermic reactions, like burning thermite, can create nanotubes naturally.
The nanotubes could have also been used as a container for nano-sized particles of an oxidizer like iron-oxide mixed in with a reducing agent such as aluminum. If what I know about the electrical conducting properties of graphene is correct this may have have allowed the nanothermite to be detonated by an electrical current instead of a magnesium fuse.”
SIMPLE FACTS OF TEMPERATURES
Simple Facts of Temperatures:
~1535ºC (2795ºF) – melting point of iron.
~1510ºC (2750ºF) – melting point of typical structural steel.
~825ºC (1517ºF) – maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air – blue flame).
Diffuse flames burn far cooler.
Oxygen-starved diffuse flames are cooler yet.The fires in the Towers were diffuse and well below 800ºC.
Jet Fuel (JET A-1): “Commercial jet fuel is essentially kerosene…”
~260-315°C (500-599°F) – open air burning temperature of JET A-1.
~980°C (1796°F) – maximum burning temperature of JET A-1.
~2500ºC (4532ºF) – maximum temperature of Thermite.
~660ºC (1120ºF) – melting point of Aluminum(turns silver rapidly when cooled).
~233ºC (451ºF) – Ignition temperature of paper (No chemicals added).
~1800-2500°C (3272-4532°F) – Melting point of Concrete