EVIDENCE OF NANO THERMITE

EVIDENCE OF NANO THERMITE

EVIDENCE OF NANO THERMITE

After the dust settled, several residents from New York collected dust samples and gave them to independent scientists to study. After years of research, these scientists discovered that Nano Thermite was found in all of these WTC dust samples. In 2009, it was Peer reviewed in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal (Steven Jones, Niels Harrit et al.). To this day, NIST and other researchers have never debunked the scientific peer reviewed paper or tested the dust themselves. Nano Thermite is a military grade incendiary/explosive created in US military labs, not from caves in the Tora Bora region. For more information on Nano Thermite, research ‘Iron rich spheres’, ‘Red gray chips’. Jon Cole “The great thermate debate”. ‘Nano Tubes’.
————-
What is Nano Thermite?

NANO THERMITE
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/wtc-towers/nano-thermite/
————
What is Nano Thermite?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjYwhB9WpFE
Nano Thermite = Fe2 O3 + 2Al
————

NANO THERMITE RESEARCH

BYU Physics Prof. Steven Jones Shows Video Evidence of Thermite Use on 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pL0M5ST8jY

nanothermitejones
———–
The Un-Debunkable Molten Metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3qZG0T6__4
———–
Debunking Thermite: Not Molten Aluminum
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFXFkN6FaI
————
Energetic Nanocomposites
http://911review.com/means/demolition/nanocomposites.html
————
Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html
———–
How to Debunk Nano Thermite
http://digwithin.net/2013/12/08/thermite/
———–
Did nano-thermite take down the WTC? — RT
http://rt.com/usa/news/did-nano-thermite-take-down-the-wtc/
————
A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o (10 mins)

“Molten metal pours out of the South Tower several minutes before the collapse. This indicates the whole structure was being weakened in advance. Then the regular explosives come into play.” – Niels Harrit
———–
The 9/11 “Deep Mystery” and the Crazy Engineers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXkS0b7rZjA
————–
thermite-fingerprint

Thermite Finger Print – A Special Report by Visibility 9-11
http://www.visibility911.org/thermite-finger-print-a-special-report-by-visibility-9-11/
———–

PEER REVIEWED PAPER

Peer reviewed Journal: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe pp.7-31 (25)
Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen.
http://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCPJ-2-7

“We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.”
———–
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
http://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCIEJ-2-35
———–
“Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction”
http://journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp.pdf
———–
40wtc_iron_rich_sphere1
————

NIST NANO THERMITE

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf
————
“23. Why didn’t the NIST investigation consider reports of molten steel in the wreckage from the WTC towers?

NIST investigators and experts from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEONY)—who inspected the WTC steel at the WTC site and the salvage yards—found no evidence that would support the melting of steel in a jet-fuel ignited fire in the towers prior to collapse. The condition of the steel in the wreckage of the WTC towers (i.e., whether it was in a molten state or not) was irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse since it does not provide any conclusive information on the condition of the steel when the WTC towers were standing.

Under certain circumstances it is conceivable for some of the steel in the wreckage to have melted after the buildings collapsed. Any molten steel in the wreckage was more likely due to the high temperature resulting from long exposure to combustion within the pile than to short exposure to fires or explosions while the buildings were standing.”
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm
————
NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg
————
9/11 Skepticism: NIST floor test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W37g_uLYNs
————

FEMA METALLURGICAL EXAMINATION

Limited Metallurgical Examination (FEMA 403 Appendix C)
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf

fema_appendix

“The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires.” FEMA, C-13, Appendix C.6
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/WTC_apndxC.htm
—————
“Why do the same five or so individuals turn up in investigations relating to terrorist attacks, when, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), there are 1.5 million engineers in the US? The authors of the official report on the Murrah Federal building – Gene Corley, Charles Thornton, Paul Mlaker, and Mete Sozen – were all among the initial team of the ASCE WTC investigation.”
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/Roberts_AnnotatedJones-RobertsonTranscript.pdf
—————-

AE911 EXPERIMENTS

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

THERMITE – It can CUT I-Beams and Girders (Short Version)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmA59hQnoOU
———-
9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw
———-
Mark Basile ignites a chip (nano-thermite) – 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1TwVACENAo
——-
Linear Thermite Cutting Charges
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M
———-
Kevin Ryan: Experiments with nanothermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O66UyGNrmSI
———-

CARBON NANOTUBES

Carbon Nanotubes
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/wtc-towers/nano-thermite/carbon-nanotubes/
———

SIMPLE FACTS OF TEMPERATURES

Simple Facts of Temperatures:
~1535ºC (2795ºF) – melting point of iron.
~1510ºC (2750ºF) – melting point of typical structural steel.
~825ºC (1517ºF) – maximum temperature of hydrocarbon fires burning in the atmosphere without pressurization or pre-heating (premixed fuel and air – blue flame).
Diffuse flames burn far cooler.
Oxygen-starved diffuse flames are cooler yet.The fires in the Towers were diffuse and well below 800ºC.
Source: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/melting-temperature-metals-d_860.html

Jet Fuel (JET A-1): “Commercial jet fuel is essentially kerosene…”
~260-315°C (500-599°F) – open air burning temperature of JET A-1.
~980°C (1796°F) – maximum burning temperature of JET A-1.
Sources: http://mepetroleum.com/jet_fuel.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel

Other:
~2500ºC (4532ºF) – maximum temperature of Thermite.
~660ºC (1120ºF) – melting point of Aluminum(turns silver rapidly when cooled).
~233ºC (451ºF) – Ignition temperature of paper (No chemicals added).
~1800-2500°C (3272-4532°F) – Melting point of Concrete
============================

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: