CCTV FOOTAGE (JUDICIAL WATCH)

CCTV FOOTAGE (JUDICIAL WATCH)

At least two plaintiffs have attempted to obtain videos seized by the FBI, using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The first, documented at Flight77.info, began with a request to the FBI in October of 2004. The second, undertaken by the Judicial Watch, Inc. began with a request to the Department of Defense (DOD) in December of 2004. Following is a timeline of the requests and subsequent lawsuits.

foialogo

Sources:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080208102217/http://www.flight77.info/85videos.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/footage.html
http://www.judicialwatch.org/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29075633/Larson-FOIA-FBI-Pentagon-AA77
————–
September 9, 2005: Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division files a DECLARATION describing her search for records responsive to Bingham’s FOIA request. Maguire admits to determining that 85 videotapes in the FBI’s possession are “potentially responsive” the request, that she personally viewed 29 of the tapes, and that she located only one videotape that showed the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. Maguire also refers to “one videotape taken from a closed circuit television at a Doubletree Hotel in Arlington Virginia,” but states that it did not show the impact of Flight 77.

September 26, 2005: Hodes files a request seeking “copies of 85 videotapes in the possession of the FBI described in the declaration of Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire dated September 7, 2005.

October 20, 2005: The DOJ sends a letter to Hodes claiming that the requested material is exempt.

October 24, 2005: Hodes appeals the DOJ’s October 20 claim that its material is exempt.

February 22, 2006: Judicial Watch, Inc. files a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Department of Defense for its refusal to disclose records sought under the FOIA request.

May 5, 2006: Judge Friedman orders the defendants to show cause on or before May 26, 2006 why their motion for summary judgment should not be denied as moot, noting that the criminal proceedings against Moussaoui have ended.

May 16, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains two videos from the DOD, and posts them on their website. The site is down for about half of the day due to demand.

September 15, 2006: Judicial Watch announces the release of video from CITGO gas station. The video consists mostly of views of the interior of the gas station and does not appear to capture the attack.

December 2, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains a video recording from the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington. The video, which does not include a view of the Pentagon’s facade, shows an explosion but does not capture an approaching jetliner.
———–
Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video — 1 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L75Gga92WO8

Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video — 2 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAaP4Z3zls8
————
Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Citgo Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk
————
Judicial Watch 9/11 Doubletree Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bapUohJn1E8
————

PENTAGON SECURITY CAMERA (CCTV)

The 5 Frames from the Pentgon CCTV security video were released in 2002, actual footage was released in May, 2006.

158

Aerial 1 CCTV
———
Pentagon Makes Public 9/11 Footage (2006)
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-224_162-1622101.html

“The government had previously withheld the video, claiming that it might taint the jury pool in the sentencing trial of confessed 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui, CBS’ Bianca Solorzano reports. The tape had been provided to the Justice Department as evidence in criminal proceedings, the Pentagon said.”
————-
Pentagon Video Security Gate Cam September 11th
CCTV Frames
http://911review.org/brad.com/pentagonvideo_cctv_cam.html
———
Pentagon surveillance cctv 2001/9/11 :
Where are the missing frames ?
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/archive/english1.html
———-
Released footage of Pentagon an edited FRAUD. (Ignore after 4:38)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzh-EyxKwc
———-
The Pentagon Security Camera on 911 (Part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwrIsq4XaQg
————–
The 5 Still Frames
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3iQuoyGIPo

Do you see an American Airlines 757?
————
Pentagon tapes
http://www.vid.me/CgbR

“A scene taken from documentary film : 9/11 the new pearl harbour”
————

THE TWO CCTV CAMERAS

CCTV FRAME 1

CCTV #1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwzT0QnwtTE (@1:26)

cctv1plane

CCTV1 FRAMES

CCTV #2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgyPbUoe2iA& (@0:24)

frame2cctvplane

CCTV2 FRAMES


—————

VIDEO MANIPULATION?

Is the Pentagon CCTV  footage authentic? I have listed several reasons why I believe the frame(s) have been manipulated, edited, photoshopped or removed.

Reason Number 1 – There is no shadow from this “smoke trail/nose cone” on the lawn but very noticeable from the fireball in the very next frame. Also, the Govt must determine if this is the “Nose cone” or the “Smoke trail”, they can’t have it both ways. Also notice how the thick cork screwed “smoke trail” disappears within one frame.

Reason number 2 – The 2nd frame appears to be missing. Right as we see the “plane” coming into frame,  the very next frame is a half exploded fireball. How did this happen within 1 second? The 3rd and 4th frames go back to real time as the fireball is a little larger.

As we saw with the towers. The plane entered the buildings and then the explosion. But in the CCTV footage video, we see the fireball so quickly. I believe a frame has been removed.

Reason Number 3 – The time stamp is dated for Sept 12th and the time is wrong. Who added these time stamps to the CCTV footage?

Reason Number 4 – Why would the Govt release crappy quality/slow frame rate that does not clearly show a plane and still refuse to release all the footage from the Pentagon. The video they did release has caused much division and misinformation being spread within the movement. If this was all by design, then it worked clearly in the perps favor.

Reason Number 5 – The “Flash Frame”. If you watch the CCTV footage you will notice that one CCTV records the flash on the Fireball Frame. The other CCTV records the flash 8 seconds (Frames) later. Screenshot below.

Pentagoncctvflash.JPG
————
New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release – Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved
http://www.sott.net/article/124446-New-Doctored-Video-of-Pentagon-Attack-Release-Confirms-Boeing-Was-Not-Involved

“It only took four and a half years, but finally the U.S. government has seen fit to confirm what so many of us have been saying all along – Pentagon security cameras recorded no evidence of a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon.”
————–

THE COP CAR

After “Flight 77” hit the Pentagon, shortly after that a “cop car” drives across the Pentagon lawn near the same spot where “Flight 77” came in. Take a look at this. Open up two windows at each part noted for each video.

CCTV FLIGHT 77 COP CAR

CCTV #1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwzT0QnwtTE
Pause at 1:26 and 2:42 (Open 2 windows)

cctv1 copcar2

cctv1plane

CCTV# 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgyPbUoe2iA
Pause at 0:24 and 1:40 (Open 2 windows)

cctv2copcar

frame2cctvplane

—————-
Here is a diagram comparing the cop car to a Boeing 757. Not totally accurate but this shows what I mean. The birds-eye view will show objects in the background smaller than in a normal view. This should be taken into account when making a comparison.

copcarcompareframe1.jpg

pentagoncopcarcomapre

757 cop car Compare
757copcar2

assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/12/27/alg_delta_plane_detroit.jpg
cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/7/7/5/0227577.jpg
—————–

WHO RECORDER THE CCTV FOOTAGE?

Oral History Interview with Brian Austin and Steve Pennington (November 9th, 2006)
http://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/oral_history/OH_Trans_AustinBrian%20Steve%20Pennington111-9-2006.pdf

To make this brief, Brian Austin and Steve Pennington worked for Radeon. The company that installed the CCTV cameras at the security gate. They make some interesting points in this article that begs more questions than answers. Why was every camera confiscated by the FBI except for the 2 CCTV cameras. Are we really led to believe that the FBI or anyone else at the Pentagon did not know that these cameras were not operational? Then he claims that all they other cameras were damaged but claims to have looked at them.
—————

PLANE INSERTS


—————-

NEW STUDY ON THE CCTV FRAMES

New study by Ken Jenkins, Nathan Flach and David Chandler.
Pentagon Surveillance Camera Video Frames
http://911speakout.org/?page_id=821

“To blink the pairs of images (showing video frames just before and just after the plane enters the view) move the mouse cursor onto and off of the image area without clicking. This works with both the full and magnified images. These png images are the ones provided directly in the FOIA release and have better color resolution than the earlier animated gif images that were made from them. There has been no image enhancement from what was received in the FOIA request, only magnification for the zoomed image pair.”


—————

CITGO VIDEO

September 15, 2006: Judicial Watch announces the release of video from CITGO gas station. The video consists mostly of views of the interior of the gas station and does not appear to capture the attack.

citgocamera
———-
Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Citgo Video (Sept 2006)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk
——
“Velasquez says the gas station’s security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. “I’ve never seen what the pictures looked like,” he said. “The FBI was here within minutes and took the film.””
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/12/1211_wirepentagon.html
——-
SGT Lagasse and SGT Brooks destroy the official story.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elKov_UZDQE
——–
Analysis of the CITGO security cameras (Wayne Coste)
http://www.hopeoutloud.org/pentagon/911_MonthlyConferenceCall_Apr27_01.pdf
————

DOUBLETREE VIDEO

December 2, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains a video recording from the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington. The video, which does not include a view of the Pentagon’s facade, shows an explosion but does not capture an approaching jetliner.
———-
doubletree

Video from security camera at Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia. Security video showing rotating footage from different camera locations at hotel; no camera captures impact of plane into Pentagon.
——–
Pentagon Doubletree video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3ExaPnaXDY

doubletreecam
——–
9/11 – Doubletree Security Footage (FULL)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8bPr5i-zfQ&
(Explosion @ 3:49)
———
Pentagon 9/11 Explosion Doubletree Hotel CCTV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq7Een-tx3s
———-
Doubletree Video – New 9/11 Pentagon video released (CNN)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4O4R0LWCQ4

Doubletree Video – New 9/11 Pentagon video released (Dec 2006)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNfkej6YyeY

Doubletree Hotel Video Pentagon Explosion, zoomed in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qHLN-7j-O8
——–
Hotel security video shows 9/11 Pentagon blast, but no plane
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/12/02/saturday/index.html

“WASHINGTON (CNN) — A hotel security camera video released by the U.S. government showed the explosion that followed the crash of American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, but the low-quality recording did not capture an image of the 757 jetliner.

The video, recorded by a security camera at the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington, was released to public interest group Judicial Watch and others who filed a lawsuit seeking the tape and other videos from that day.

CNN filed a Freedom of Information request for the video in February 2002, after the manager of the hotel disclosed its existence to CNN Senior Pentagon Correspondent Jamie McIntyre and said it had been confiscated by the FBI. CNN’s FOI request was denied because at the time the tape was considered evidence in the investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, who has since been convicted.”
———-

SHERATON VIDEO

This video footage has never been released to the public.
———-
The Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/footage.html
———-

Sheraton Hotel Video (Never Released)
i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Video%20cameras/video1.jpg

The Sheraton camera would have captured “Flight 77” flying almost directly overhead. The FBI was at the Sheraton within minutes to confiscate this camera…… and it has never been released.

From the Ballroom of the Sheraton National Hotel, over looking the Navy Annex with the Air Force Memorial and Pentagon in the foreground.
http://www.airforcememorial.org/

Sheraton National Hotel
900 S. Orme Street
Arlington, VA 22204…
http://www.sheratonnational.com/location.htm

Views from the Sheraton….


http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1116446584401&
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1116523106314&
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1116447064413&
——–
Video of attack
http://web.archive.org/web/20021219062257/http://www.gertzfile.com/gertzfile/ring092101.html
“Now word has reached us that federal investigators may have video footage of the deadly terrorist attack on the Pentagon.

A security camera atop a hotel close to the Pentagon may have captured dramatic footage of the hijacked Boeing 757 airliner as it slammed into the western wall of the Pentagon. Hotel employees sat watching the film in shock and horror several times before the FBI confiscated the video as part of its investigation.

It may be the only available video of the attack. The Pentagon has told broadcast news reporters that its security cameras did not capture the crash.

The attack occurred close to the Pentagon’s heliport, an area that normally would be under 24-hour security surveillance, including video monitoring.”
————
http://www.pagenews.info/foipa/foipa_03242005_reply.php
“A search of the automated indices to our central records systems revealed no record concerning a video obtained from the Sheraton National Hotel.”
————
The Sheraton camera would have captured “Flight 77” flying almost directly overhead. The FBI was at the Sheraton within minutes to confiscate this camera…… and it has never been released. Instead, they release the Doubletree Hotel and the Citgo Gas Station videos which shows no American Airline 757.

  1. New study by Ken Jenkins, Nathan Flach and David Chandler.

    Pentagon Surveillance Camera Video Frames
    http://911speakout.org/?page_id=821

    “To blink the pairs of images (showing video frames just before and just after the plane enters the view) move the mouse cursor onto and off of the image area without clicking. This works with both the full and magnified images. These png images are the ones provided directly in the FOIA release and have better color resolution than the earlier animated gif images that were made from them. There has been no image enhancement from what was received in the FOIA request, only magnification for the zoomed image pair.”

    Group Thread:
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/2204686781/permalink/10153295722451782/

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: