REMOTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

REMOTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

REMOTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

Many 9/11 Truthers believe that Remote Control Military Drones hit the towers and that they weren’t the original flights. This research will show that Remote Technology was around long before 911.

remotecontroltech

GPS-Guided Autopilot capable of steering 9/11 Jets into buildings
Plausibility Of 9/11 Aircraft Attacks Generated By GPS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems
By Aidan Monaghan (B.Sc., EET)
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/AutopilotSystemsMonaghan.pdf
—————
System Planning Corporation: Radar & Measurement Technology: Flight Termination System (FTS)
http://www.sysplan.com/capabilities/radar/fts/

“The Flight Termination System (FTS) is a fully redundant turn-key range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles. The FTS consists of SPC’s Command Transmitter System (CTS) and custom control, interface, and monitoring subsystems. The system is fully programmable and is flexible enough to meet the changing requirements of today’s modern test ranges.”

Israel could take control of hijacked passenger planes long before 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLizu_J2BRA

spclogo
————–

NASA

Controlled Impact Demonstration
http://www1.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/FactSheets/FS-003-dfrc.html

“A series of 14 preliminary flights with safety pilots on board were flown to introduce the modified fuel incrementally into some of the fuel tanks and engines while engine performance was monitored. During the 14 flights, the Boeing 720 was controlled remotely by a pilot at a ground-based console for 16 hours and 22 minutes, including 10 takeoffs, 69 controlled landing approaches, and 13 landings on the abort runway.”
————-
NASA Himat(Highly Maneuverable Aircraft Technology)
AEROSPACE FLIGHTS (1980-1986)

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4406/chap8.html
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/PAO/PAIS/HTML/FS-025-DFRC.html
http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/history/bna/himat.htm
http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/history/bna/himatdat.htm
————
Controlled Impact Demonstration – NASA experiment testing a remote controlled Boeing 720 in 1984 at Edwards Air Force Base.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890006539_1989006539.pdf
http://www.edwards.af.mil/articles98/docs_html/splash/may98/cover/UAVmain.htm
————–
Controlled Impact Demonstration (1984) Aircraft Crash Test Using AMK Fuel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y33N0raKZBo

“Controlled Impact Demonstration (1984) On December 1st, 1984, a remote controlled 4 engined transport jet took off from Edwards AFB, CA and crashed into a barren patch of nearby desert. This Controlled Impact Demonstration was a joint R&D program by the FAA and NASA.”
————-

OTHER

Context of ‘August 2001: Large Passenger Jet Flown and Landed by Remote Control’
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a100201raytheon
————-
“We fly many unmanned air vehicles around the world today, mainly for military or small airplane applications,” said R. John Hansman, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics, and head of the Division of Humans and Automation, at MIT. “At a technical level, there’s no reason why we couldn’t do that with a commercial airplane.”
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/24/travel/autopilot-airlines
————-
FLIGHT CONTROL: Boeing’s ‘Uninterruptible’ Autopilot System, Drones & Remote Hijacking
http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/08/07/flight-control-boeings-uninterruptible-autopilot-system-drones-remote-hijacking/
————–
Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Honeywell_Uninterruptible_Autopilot

“The Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot is a set of sub-routines in post-1995 Boeing aircraft (termed the Unauthorized Flight Detector), aimed at defeating attempts at aircraft hijacking by removing electrical power from the flight deck, and irrevocably passing pilot authority to the autopilot and navigational computer for an automated landing at a safe airfield that can deal effectively with the incident.”
————
System and method for automatically controlling a path of travel of a vehicle

United States Patent #7,142,971
Brown , et al.
November 28, 2006

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7142971.PN.&OS=PN%2F7142971&RS=PN%2F7142971

“The method and system for automatically controlling a path of travel of a vehicle include engaging an automatic control system when the security of the onboard controls is jeopardized. Engagement may be automatic or manual from inside the vehicle or remotely via a communication link. Any onboard capability to supersede the automatic control system may then be disabled by disconnecting the onboard controls and/or providing uninterruptible power to the automatic control system via a path that does not include the onboard accessible power control element(s). The operation of the vehicle is then controlled via the processing element of the automatic control system. The control commands may be received from a remote location and/or from predetermined control commands that are stored onboard the vehicle.”
————–
Remote pilots could steer planes to safety
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/16/september11.usa9

“In the first case, aviation experts are surprisingly confident. They say devices that would allow air traffic controllers to override the controls of a hijacked plane are close to development. Boeing has made one such system and used it to steer military aircraft remotely.”
———-
F16 being flown by remote control (2013)
http://fox2now.com/2013/11/21/f16-being-flown-by-remote-control/
“ST. LOUIS, MO (KTVI)– One of America’s premier fighter jets is now being flown by remote control thanks to engineers at Boeing in St. Louis.”
—————
Planes That Know What to Bomb (Nov 2001)
http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2001-11-11/planes-that-know-what-to-bomb

“But in Afghanistan, the U.S. had a trick up its sleeve: In place of fighter pilots, it sent in small, remote-controlled Predator drones–originally designed for reconnaissance but now armed with Hellfire antitank missiles.”
—————
“The Flying Test Bed”
http://www.baesystems.com/magazine/BAES_051920/look-no-hands?
———
Pilotless passenger planes prepare for take-off
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20130502-pilotless-planes-plan-to-take-off

“Any fly-by-wire plane can be an [Unmanned Aerial Vehicle],” she explains. “The controls are digital, not analogue, everything is done electronically so you don’t need a person in there to push a hydraulic actuator.”
————
Diagrams: Boeing patents anti-terrorism auto-land system for hijacked airliners (Dec 2006)
http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/diagrams-boeing-patents-anti-terrorism-auto-land-system-for-hijacked-210869/

“Boeing last week received a US patent for a system that, once activated, removes all control from pilots to automatically return a commercial airliner to a predetermined landing location.

The “uninterruptible” autopilot would be activated – either by pilots, by onboard sensors, or even remotely via radio or satellite links by government agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency, if terrorists attempt to gain control of a flight deck. “

“To make it fully independent, the system has its own power supply, independent of the aircraft’s circuit breakers. The aircraft remains in automatic mode until after landing, when mechanics or government security operatives are called in to disengage the system.”

“Once the automatic control system provided by the present invention is initiated, no one on board the air vehicle is capable controlling the flight to the air vehicle, such that it would be useless for anyone to threaten violence in order to gain control the air vehicle.””
———-
Feds Say That Banned Researcher Commandeered a Plane
http://www.wired.com/2015/05/feds-say-banned-researcher-commandeered-plane/

“Chris Roberts, a security researcher with One World Labs, told the FBI agent during an interview in February that he had hacked the in-flight entertainment system, or IFE, on an airplane and overwrote code on the plane’s Thrust Management Computer while aboard the flight. He was able to issue a climb command and make the plane briefly change course, the document states.”
————-
ENHANCED FLIGHT TERMINATION SYSTEM STUDY
http://www.wsmr.army.mil/RCCsite/Documents/Enhanced%20Flight%20Termination%20System%20Study,%20Phase%20I-IV/EFTS-02.pdf
————

OPERATION NORTHWOODS

Operation Northwoods was a series of False flag proposals that originated within the United States Government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.

operationnorthwoods
————–
Operation Northwoods
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/northwoods.html?q=northwoods.html

“An aircraft at Elgin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CJA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone [a remotely controlled unmanned aircraft]. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida.”
—————–
U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662

“In the early 1960s, America’s top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.

Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.”
—————-

OPERATION APHRODITE (1944)

aphroditiedrone

Operation Aphrodite “Weary Willy”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdzMkaU0OkE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSj9VBIvfk
——–
Operation Aphrodite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTWZjbie-dI
——-
“Operation Aphrodite’ was the World War II code name of a secret USAAF program that began in 1944. Pilotless aircraft packed with explosives were remotely controlled into their targets.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Aphrodite
————–

BUSH TALKS ABOUT REMOTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY SHORTLY AFTER 9/11

Text: Bush on Airline Safety Measures
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/bush_092701.html

“We will invest in new technology for aircraft security, with grants to develop transponders that cannot be switched off from the cockpit; video monitors in the cockpit to alert pilots to trouble in the cabin – and we will look at all kinds of technologies to make sure that our airlines are safe – and for example, including technology to enable controllers to take over distressed aircraft and land it by remote control.” – George W. Bush (Sept 27, 2001)

CSPAN Video
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4498608/bush
——–
Bush Announces New Airline Security Measures
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/transportation-july-dec01-air-security_09-27/

“The president said new security measures would also dramatically increase the number of plainclothes federal marshals on airplanes, give $500 million to developing enhanced cockpit security and enable air traffic controllers to take over a distressed aircraft and land it by remote control.”

bushremotecontrol
———-
Landing by remote control doesn’t quite fly with pilots
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-09-28/news/0109280208_1_remote-air-line-pilots-association-plane

“The military has been flying planes and landing them safely by remote control for years, but airline pilots say questions about security must be answered before that technology is used aboard commercial jetliners to thwart hijackers the way President Bush suggested Thursday during a speech in Chicago.”
———-

9/11 PLANES FLEW DIRECTLY OVER MILITARY BASES

The 4 Planes on 9/11 flew near or directly over military bases. In particular Flights 11 and 175 crossed directly over Stewart Airforce Base. Fighter jets are on standby 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and 365 days a year at these bases.
———-
Map: Hijacked 9/11 Flights and Military Bases
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/911/911-flightpaths-bases.html
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/911/911-bases-flightpaths.jpg

flightpathsmilitarybases
———–

STEWART AIR FORCE BASE

Planes Switched at Stewart AFB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utfij7_mKLk
stewart
———–
“In 2000, the airport became the first U.S. commercial airport privatized when United Kingdom-based National Express Group was awarded a 99-year lease on the airport. After postponing its plans to change the facility’s name after considerable local opposition, it announced plans to sell its rights to the airport.[5]”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_International_Airport

Original source:
http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060929/NEWS/609290323
———
Lauder had his sights set on Stewart Airport in Newburgh, New York. On March 31st, 2000, Lauder vaunted that New York became the first state in the nation to privatize a commercial airport, awarding the contract to UK-based National Express Group, which at the time, was owned by Zionist William Rollason (49). Stewart Airport, is where the paths of Flight 175 and Flight 11 oddly and chillingly converged on 9/11 (50).”
http://www.maskofzion.com/2010/09/911-israels-grand-deception.html
——–
“In 2000, the airport became the first U.S. commercial airport privatized when United Kingdom-based National Express Group was awarded a 99-year lease on the airport. After postponing its plans to change the facility’s name after considerable local opposition, it announced plans to sell its rights to the airport.[5]”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_International_Airport

Original source:
http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060929/NEWS/609290323
————-

MILITARY DRONES

Military Drones on 9/11?
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-flights/military-drones/
———–
Pilots For 9/11 Truth Presents “9/11 INTERCEPTED”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k
———-
Inside 9/11 – Who controlled the planes?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4
———–

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: