DEBUNKING NANO THERMITE

DEBUNKING NANO THERMITE ATTEMPTS

Listed throughout this page are several failed attempts at debunking Nano Thermite.
———
How to Debunk WTC Thermite
http://digwithin.net/2013/12/08/thermite/
———-
9/11 Debunked – Thermite Chemical Signatures Disproven
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c24_1252616960
———–
Red-Gray Chips Tested and Determined Not to Be Thermite
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=015_1330900552
———–
Why the Harrit Nano-thermite paper has not yet been debunked
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-the-Harrit-Nano-thermi-by-Michael-Fullerton-090814-310.html
———-

DEBUNKING ATTEMPTS

CUTTER TORCH MYTH

Cutter Torch Myth put to rest, as dust samples were pre, construction crew arrival provided by Jeanette Mckinley.
Thermite Reactions – Compilation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3ZkoNF2ybg&

Cutter Torch Myth put to rest, as dust samples were pre construction crew arrival provided by Jeanette Mckinley.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrj22lX8Bdo
———–
Working at Ground Zero 6. WTC Debris, Ironworkers Cutting Steel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GniL4-sf6X4
@1:50, @6:11, @8:00, @27:14, @29:10
————-

VAN ROMERO

Van Romero, a demolition expert, former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center, and current vice present for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology said that the manner in which the twin towers collapsed, resembled those of controlled implosions used in planned demolition. “My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse,” Romero said.

Van Romero talks about his 9/11 “Retraction”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlWXpec7WAE

Listen after 4 minutes.
———–
NanoThermite compared to Fire – 9/11 Science
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxMjqskh3ec
———-
Dr. Van Romero tests thermite-blasted beam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-pZf56L0lg

“Ok, that fire burned pretty hot but did it burn hot enough to cause any strutcural damage. Let’s put it to the test, nope, still looks like it’s in good shape.” Van Romero

Van Romero failed to use the right mixture with the right application and then he claimed “debunked”.

thermitevanromero
————
NanoThermite compared to Fire – 9/11 Science (Van Romero on Conspiracy Theory)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxMjqskh3ec (look closely at 1:02)
—————-

MOLTEN ALUMINUM AND WATER THEORY

New theory explains 911 twin tower collapses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=ftncKDv4JMs&
————
New theory on Twin Towers’ collapse
http://news.uk.msn.com/world/new-theory-on-twin-towers-collapse

Quotes:

“Both scientific experiments and 250 reported disasters suffered by the aluminium industry have shown that the combination of molten aluminium and water releases enormous explosions,” said Dr Simensen, from the SINTEF institute based in Trondheim, Norway.”
—————
“Explosions triggered by molten aircraft metal reacting with water from sprinkler systems may have felled the Twin Towers after the 9/11 attacks, according to a new theory.”
—————-
“But Norwegian expert Dr Christian Simensen believes the powerful explosions were caused by a chemical reaction between molten aluminum from the aircraft and water ripped out the buildings’ internal structure.”
—————
“Just before the two World Trade Centre skyscrapers in New York collapsed on September 11 2001, powerful blasts were heard within the buildings and a leading materials scientist says they could be the key to the dramatic conclusion of the terrorist attacks.”
—————-
“Over-heated steel beams have been blamed for the towers suddenly crashing to the ground after they were hit by two passenger jets.”
——————

REBUTTAL

Molten Aluminum mixed with water caused the explosions…… WTF??? I will show you HOW FALSE this theory is! Besides, weren’t we told that the sprinklers were not working in the towers?

How does this explain the collapse of Building 7? No Aluminum plane hit that building but all 47 floors collapsed in 6.5 seconds just like a traditional Controlled demolition. Even NIST admitted to free fall.
———–
How come MSN publishes this immediately, but nothing on what AE911truth (1600+ architects & engineers) have found YEARS ago based on scientific research?
————-
Activist Post: Michael Rivero Punches Holes in the Latest Twin Towers Collapse Theory
http://www.activistpost.com/2011/09/michael-rivero-punches-holes-in-latest.html
————–
Senior Scientist Difinitively Explains Collapse of World Trade Center Then Pukes a Little
http://truthsquad.tv/?p=1448
—————
Why are Scientific Sites promoting this?

New Theory Explains Collapse of World Trade Center’s Twin Towers
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110921074747.htm
——-
Were Twin Towers felled by chemical blasts? (Update)
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html
———
Shame on the Canadian Media:
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/theory+Twin+Towers/5436122/story.html
http://www.canada.com/news/theory+Twin+Towers+collapse+Study/5436052/story.html
http://www.vancouversun.com/Aluminum+water+chemical+reactions+caused+Twin+Towers+collapse+expert/5440929/story.html
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/theory+Twin+Towers+collapse+Study/5436052/story.html
—————
SINTEF Telecom & Informatics $10,000 –
American Defense International

American Defense International (ADI) is mainly a lobbying firm. It describes itself as “A Washington, DC-based consulting firm specializing in government affairs, business development, and public relations … [which] serves a worldwide client base — both businesses and governments — with a unique combination of technical expertise, relationships, and the ability to work with Washington’s most important decision makers and opinion leaders.”

“As the descriptions of [the ADI] staff and Board of Advisors show, ADI’s top-notch personnel includes former senior government officials, military officers, and congressional aides. Having started with a focus on national defense and military matters, ADI has since branched into other areas including homeland security.“
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Defense_International
————
Here is a Department of Energy document showing how Water reacts with Molten Aluminum.
https://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/aluminium_water_hydrogen.pdf

It can’t produce enough Hydrogen unless you were to bottle or pressurize it.
————–

MOLTEN ALUMINUM MYTH

The Aluminum Myth:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Molten_Aluminum_Poured_onto_Rusty_Steel_by_Wes_Lifferth.pdf
———-
Debunking Thermite: Not Molten Aluminum
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFXFkN6FaI&

“A large flow of molten iron could be seen falling from the 81st floor of WTC 2 five minutes before it collapsed. The light yellow color of the metal indicates that is is well over 1,000 degrees C. If this were aluminum, as some would argue, it would have melted at about 660 degrees C. and would appear silver-grey in daylight conditions.”
———
WTC THERMITE?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qitq-a9DXBU
——–
9/11: Stabilized WTC2 (Ben R.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SD2DBUJl0OM&
——–
EVIDENCE OF THERMITE AT THE SOUTH TOWER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lv2ck2qsiGA&
————–
21. Why does NIST state that a yellow stream of molten metal seen in some photographs pouring down the side of WTC2 was aluminum from the crashed plane, even though aluminum burns with a white glow?

“NIST reported (NIST NCSTAR 1-5A) that just before 9:52 a.m., a bright spot appeared at the top of a window on the 80th floor of WTC 2, four windows removed from the east edge on the north face, followed by the flow of a glowing liquid. This flow lasted approximately four seconds before subsiding.”
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm
———-
New Evidence Is Reported That Floors Failed on 9/11 (Dec 2003)
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/nyregion/new-evidence-is-reported-that-floors-failed-on-9-11.html?
“Finally, an unexplained cascade of molten metal from the northeast corner of the south tower just before it collapsed might have started when a floor carrying pieces of one of the jetliners began to sag and fail. The metal was probably molten aluminum from the plane and could have come through the top of an 80th floor window as the floor above gave way, Dr. Pitts said.”

NOVA and Dr. Eagar Team Up to Sell the Truss Theory
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/experts/articles/eagar_nova/nova_eagar2.html
———–

REBUTTAL

9/11: South Tower Collapse (ABC Live)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6f9Jpfz1Vo

Starts at 25 seconds and continues until 1:45 then the building collapses 15 seconds later. NIST states that the “flow lasted approximately four seconds.” This is a blatant lie since this video is proof that the flow lasted for nearly 1 minute and 20 seconds.
========================

MOLTEN ALUMINUM EXPERIMENTS

Aluminum_molten

Experiments (Molten Aluminum and water)

Molten Aluminum vs. Water two part battle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29O-8LckmiU
———
Molten aluminum into cold water
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qJzDYsQfck
——–
Aluminum don’t glow yellow in daylight conditions, it’s silvery – 9/11 (Mark Basile)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jieFF1rnx0Y
——–
Re: Molten Aluminum at 1800F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30OVAvg1aGQ
——–
More experiments with molten aluminum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhbaiuK3M3U&
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zy4QRnqhuUo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv_nGplFHu0
———–
Aluminum melts at a bright yellow (not orange) and cools (still liquid) as silver. Rather quickly.
http://www.cache.daylife.com/imageserve/03Cr52lfTzd2U/340x.jpg
http://www.coloradofirecamp.com/Cramer/images/appendix_d_photo_2.jpg
——–

ALUMINUM AKYL

Aluminum Alkyl & Water – UNCONTROLLED
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9ZeXWavYQ
——–
Aluminum Alkyl and Water .. Big Boom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WN-szfhIOA8

al•kyl (lkl)
n.
A monovalent radical, such as ethyl or propyl, having the general formula CnH2n+1.

“Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons. They consist only of hydrogen and carbon atoms, all bonds are single bonds, and the carbon atoms are not joined in cyclic structures but instead form a simple chain. They have the general chemical formula CnH2n+2.”
————–
Aluminum Explosion (@3:00)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd6p998WcAw

We don’t really know what this is. Looks like a classroom experiment.
—————
Aluminium Thermal Explosion (@1:10)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdtZVgOIPC0

Not really exploding but more so boiling pockets of water bursting upwards.
————
Not Molten Sulfur either:
http://www.photovolcanica.com/VolcanoInfo/Kawah%20Ijen/Kawah%20Ijen.html
—————–
Debunking Thermite: Not Molten Aluminum
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFXFkN6FaI
===========================

NANO THERMITE AND WATER

Water Processed Nanothermite Inks for Direct Deposition On Low Energy Initiators
https://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2012/webprogram/Paper279655.html
——–
Kinetic Studies of Ultra-Fast Condensed- Phase Reactions
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:geTmY3hWLIAJ:comp.chem.umn.edu/CNER/Puszynski-2005_files/Puszynski-2005.ppt+nano+thermite+water+reaction&hl=en&gl=ca&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjWe1l79teFfIEU4500v8klnSosYy4rC62IvsUTapEl8nw-MpGX-nwU8sNz0wrPcwgVuHvh2Cv8hKF5XHeTu0aJEatdLZWI6JcxfV7nAMMrTthIEIF1Zoy1S03ZXSpRzgOxCCRr&sig=AHIEtbTa1ajFPmh3_g8yyZLJe0PIRROoUg
——-
“So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings? I don’t claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy’s underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a “gravity driven collapse” without demolition charges defies the laws of physics.”
http://theintelhub.com/2012/09/12/flashback-huffington-post-censors-jesse-ventura-911-article-2/
http://www.freeworldfilmworks.com/a911-venturabook.htm
————-
Ground Zero’s fires still burning
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1634-ground-zeros-fires-still-burning.html

“Almost 12 weeks after the terrorist atrocity at New York’s World Trade Center, there is at least one fire still burning in the rubble – it is the longest-burning structural fire in history.

Deputy Chief Charles Blaich of the New York City Fire Department would not predict when the last fire might be extinguished. But compared to the situation at the end of September, when aerial thermal images showed the whole of Ground Zero to be a hot spot, conditions today are much safer for the workers clearing the rubble.

This is in part due to the use of a special foaming agent called Pyrocool FEF. On 27 September, the officials ordered 2000 gallons of the liquid, which when added to water produces a slippery, low-viscosity foam.”
—————–
According to their website: “Pyrocool FEF is intended for use at 0.4% in solution with fresh, brackish, or saltwater.”
http://www.pyrocooltech.com/pyrocool-fef/

So that means, if the FDNY ordered 2000 Gallons of pyrocool FEF, which mixes at 0.4% (with the other 99.6% being water) That would make 500,000 gallons of Water/Pyrocool mixture!
————

THERMITE DISINFO

Misinfo Claim: Steven Jones claimed this photo was evidence of a thermite reaction.

disinfothermitejones

(Pic link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=286990411318093&)

A picture that Steven Jones used one time in this paper:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf

Give Steven Jones some slack for this. He knows it was in his error and admits it.

This picture was edited to add a glowing Orange compared to the original.

http://hereisnewyork.org/gallery/showbig.asp?photoID=5575

Here is the actual video footage of these firefighters gathered around a bright flash light. Probably looking for survivors.

Molten Steel on ground zero explained
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW1jsUXoRgs&
————-

CONCLUSION: MISINFORMATION

Debunkers will not let this go. It was one error made by Steven Jones, which he later corrected himself.
======================

ANGLE CUTS

disinfoanglecutthermite

This is another angle cut picture other than the infamous one we are all used to. These cuts could have very well happened during cleanup. Here is a video showing angle cuts during cleanup.

WTC Angle Cut Columns during cleanup
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJyBuANVkQ4& (Falling pieces 1:31)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySHgiUxnLC0&
——————-
Is the Angle Cut Evidence of Controlled Demolition?
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-molten-steel/angle-cut/
————-
However, with this photo…….The setting is different, we see a lot of drag on the steel, and it looks very early into Rescue operations, the access to get to this beam is not there.

HDanglecutlarge
—————
There is not enough information to determine if these beams were cut by the result of explosives or if they were cut during cleanup.

CONCLUSION: MISINFORMATION
==================

MOLTEN METAL THERMITE REACTION

DISINFO CLAIM: Thermite reaction at GZ

disinfothermiteplesse

MSM Accidentally Airs Incriminating 9/11 Evidence ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw4_-4xGuHA
http://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=Si9ccJ-xPms

REBUTTAL

Working at Ground Zero 6. WTC Debris, Ironworkers Cutting Steel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GniL4-sf6X4

disinfocuttertorch

@29:10 is exactly what we are seeing only in the daylight.

Unless a Cutter torch is incriminating evidence…… the MSM did not reveal anything here…… and speculation like this discredits all the valid molten steel testimonies shown in the insets of the video.
———
NEW 9/11 Ground Zero Misinformation: Separating FACT from FICTION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOctGMr70rs&
———-

CONCLUSION: DISINFO

This is not a Thermite reaction happening hours after the attacks. It is simply the molten slag coming from a cutter torch removing the remaining columns.
=================

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: