MISINFO: Missile POD/FLASH Flight 175

MISINFO: Missile POD/FLASH Flight 175

Misinfo: Missile POD used under Flight 175

“THE POD THEORY”
(Pic Link: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=286960727987728&)

“The “Plane Pod” theory appeared out of nowhere in 2004 and was widely promoted in the professionally produced “9/11: In Plane Site.” This film covers almost none of the concrete evidence for government complicity and instead makes up new “evidence” out thin air or blurry video footage. The main thesis of the film is that there were “pods” on the undersides of the planes which fired “missiles” at the buildings before impact. This is conceivably possible, but the evidence presented is simply blurry images of “flashes” as the planes enter the buildings, making this a ludicrous, damaging claim—probably a case of deliberate propaganda by someone involved in the production or promotion of this movie.”

Pod People hijack 9/11 Truth Movement
http://www.oilempire.us/pod.html
———
ERROR: ‘A Pod Was Attached to the South Tower Plane’
http://911review.com/errors/phantom/st_plane.html
——–
Underbelly pic example:
http://www.911review.com/errors/phantom/imgs/highlights2.jpg
———-
Was Extra Equipment Attached To Flight 175? (The plane that struck the south Twin Tower on 9/11)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huK0MAb0Xa4&
——–
Eric Salter Bites Back – The Rise of the Disinformation Machine
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/disinformation/
———

PHOTOS OF THE “POD”


———-
UNDERBELLY IMAGES OF A 767

As you can see from the images, the “Bulge” is present in pretty much every underbelly image of a Boeing 767.

https://www.google.com/search?q=underbelly+767&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=goLmVKanFYWwggTwvoLYCQ&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAg&biw=1077&bih=598
————
One hour video discussing the POD Theory.

AlienScientist and Aidan Monaghan debunk 9/11 POD theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNoZKoQz8fs
————

CONCLUSION: INCONCLUSIVE SPECULATION.

The “Pod Theory” is inconclusive as it looks to be part of the planes fuselage and visible on the underbelly from other images of United Airlines Boeing 767 flights.
==================

MISINFO: FLASH BEFORE PLANE HITS TOWER

The “Flash Theory”
flashframe

Video footage of the planes crashing into the towers show that just before the planes make contact, there was a brief flash that illuminates the facade of the wall. This same flash can be seen on multiple impact videos. The “Flash theory” has several different theories. One, is that the flash was a remote control beacon for the flights that hit the towers. Two, is that a missile was shot from the plane just before contact. And three, it was a detonation of another bomb planted inside the towers. However, there is likely a more reasonable explanation. See below.

Flashes Before the Planes Hit the World Trade Center.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlTYET9pYa8
———-
9/11~(Angle-1) 2nd Plane Pod Fires on WTC-2 (South Tower)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv4aDoMOZhE
———
Impacts of the planes into WTC 1 and WTC 2: curious bright flash of light of unexplained origin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGrda2Jeqc
———-

Rebuttal

ERROR: ‘The South Tower Impact Involved Missiles and/or Explosives’
http://911review.com/errors/phantom/st_impact.html

Analysis of Aluminum Impact Flashes in the WTC Crashes
http://911review.com/errors/phantom/flash.html
——–
Group Thread:
http://www.facebook.com/groups/2204686781/permalink/10151089730156782/
——–
Here we see the same “flash of light” with this jet crash test.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk
flashdischarge

and this cargo plane crash in Afghanistan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ColjRb3gHrk
flashdischarge2

and this runway crash in Russia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScwZEmk35ck
flashdischarge3
————

CONCLUSION: INCONCLUSIVE

The “flash of light” is most likely the transfer of kinetic energy into heat, technical equipment, or static discharge as the plane makes impact.

Regardless, this type of speculation only hurts the movement and does not focus on the hard evidence. Like the “Pod Theory”, the “Flash Theory” is misinformation until more we can get more reliable sources of data. Rather than poor quality and blurry footage.
=======================

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: